Skip to main content

Is Less More with Instagram Posts?


An interesting thing happened a couple of months ago at the East Hampton Library: both the young adult and children’s departments posted on Instagram on the same day. The topics and content were completely unrelated, but we were told that we should never post on the same day again. What was interesting about it was that this was the first time the department heads had been guided on social media. The reason given was that too many posts would leave viewers uninterested and cause them to ignore our content.
 

Once we all heard that we should never post on the same day, it got me thinking: who is coordinating the content, what schedule are we following, do we have a marketing plan, should we have brand consistency with specified fonts, colors, and logos throughout? And is it true that multiple posts would have an adverse reaction?


As I started scrolling through the library’s feed, what jumped out to me was that the topics were mostly about upcoming events, with young adult and children’s content alternating. What is missing is general information about the library, as well as any adult programming or special offerings. The second thing I notice is that the likes for each post far exceed any comments. 


Comments!!?? I can never hold back on making a comment if something intrigues me, so how can we get more interaction with our socials? Ahhh, let’s think about promoting a participatory culture, a concept coined by scholar Henry Jenkins in 2006. Social media should shift people from being consumers to being creators participating in the social media culture. Entry and acceptance to participate should be easy, knowledge should be shared, and collaboration encouraged. Indeed, a public library is a social environment, and members should feel welcomed to be part of the community. 


So back to the title question – is less more with Instagram posts? What do you think? Does your library have a marketing department? What prompts you to share a post? What gets you to comment? Does the content need to spark controversy to engage you?




Comments

  1. Hey Maude, thanks for such an honest blog share this week. This topic, circling so many concepts of how social media dissemination occurs, the amount of planning necessary for such an ongoing "conversation" us librarians have with our community, the conversation on "likes" vs. "shares," these are are such excellent topics that I hope our blog can cover as we continue the semester together. Via Longwood library, a drive away from your library, I know that each department is able to post - but also the option for separate insta accounts for each age group is another intentional conversation to be had. Being admonished for something never inherently communicated is, in my opinion, just another ill-fated leadership moment, and hopefully one that can be addressed via establishing a policy or committee that speaks to to social media as whole. Thanks for the share!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rachel Robertazzi9/11/2025 09:28:00 AM

    Hi Maude,

    Thanks for a great topic to think about! Right now our senior clerk in the Teen department does most of the social media, and I do some as well. She posts pictures from programs, the weekly lineup of each program, and she also posts a What we are reading Wednesday, where staff members fill out a google doc and send it to her with what they are reading, and she posts that on a graphic along with the call number. We schedule all of our posts ahead of time using the website Later Social Media Scheduler. It's really neat because there is one login for the whole library, and everyone can see who has what scheduled when. It also gives insights as to when our top performing posts are posted, for us, we usually post at 10 am and 3 pm. As long as the posts are far enough apart in terms of hours, we will usually have different departments posting throughout the day.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm definitely a believer in the idea that you can make your own rules! The "one post a day" rule on Instagram has been around since I first made my account there back in high school. I always thought it was an interesting rule--you don't want to post too much, clog up feeds, and cause unfollows. Makes sense. But what would happen if I posted twice in a day? Honestly, with the way algorithms are these days, I doubt anyone would notice.. Sometimes I see a post that was created 20 minutes ago, followed by a post from 4 days ago. I don't typically check the posted date unless it's relevant to the post itself, so if I were to see the same person on my feed twice in a day, I wouldn't think much of it.

    Now if I were running an organization, maybe I would make a rule of two posts maximum, and they must be differing topics. Honestly, posting once a day between all of the different departments (say, adult, teen, children, for example) could lead to one department getting less posting time, or one dominating the others. If the adult department posted on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday, and the children's department posted on Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, that leaves the teen department with only Sunday. With three departments and seven days a week, there's no way for it to be equitable without creating a three week posting schedule and allowing each department seven days to post.

    So, the way I see it, I would want to get together all of the posting departments and come up with a solution--a new rule. One post a day from each department? Switch off every other day? Just because one post a day is the norm, does not make it a requirement! But maybe I'm just trying to break rules..

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Madeline Feehan Blog Post #11: Killing Eve and "Bury your Gays" Backlash

Image source: The 'Killing Eve' Finale has Infuriated Queer Fans   Blog Post #11: Killing Eve and "Bury Your Gays" Backlash By Madeline Feehan Some of the fiercest allies and supporters of diversity, equity, and inclusion (and some of its greatest opponents) can be found in the unlikeliest of places: Tumblr, Twitter, and AO3. What do these people all have in common? They are heavily immersed in fandoms. Whether they're reblogging content or creating their own, whether they're starting Reddit threads, writing fanfiction, drawing fanart, posting to their stories, making video edits, or starting petitions, these fans all share a passion for fictional worlds. So what happens when a fandom all comes together and agrees on one thing? This is what happened with the Killing Eve fandom after the show's finale. Sometimes audiences are split between opinions. For example, when a beloved book gets turned into a movie, some will argue that the book's better or that...

Kristen Strmel Blog Post #11: #UnwhitewashTheBadBatch: How Social Media Holds Creators Accountable

Image source I want to say “It’s always a good day when I can talk about Star Wars,” but that’s not always true. Loving something means acknowledging its flaws, and it’s pretty safe to say that Star Wars as a franchise has a racism problem, from the lack of the BIPOC characters in its movies (and accession to stereotypes when they were depicted), to the racist harassment that that BIPOC actors in recent shows have faced from certain sections of the fandom. While the franchise has taken steps to address these issues in recent years, it’s still got work to do–and if it doesn’t, fans are more than willing to call it out. This exact thing happened in 2021, with the release of The Bad Batch. This show follows a group of clones (soldiers born and bred specifically to fight for the Galactic Republic, introduced in the Prequel Trilogy) known as “The Bad Batch” as they try to find their place in the galaxy during the Empire’s rise. Each member of the The Bad Batch had “desirable mutations” tha...

Madeline Feehan Blog Post #12: AI Books and Libraries

Image Source: Nana a Mischevious Monkey by Shum Zay on Amazon Blog Post #12: AI Books and Libraries By Madeline Feehan Is an AI author really an author? Are AI books valid, and should they be on library shelves, or should we steer clear of them? What about  AI- assisted   work? Is the best compromise adding some to our collection and clearly labeling them as AI, or is it best to not even indulge at all?  Do you find work that was written with the help of AI but was also written by a human less egregious than something entirely written by AI? Should those books still be labeled?  These are some of the many fascinating questions discussed by guest speakers who came to my library. Lisa Zuena, Nicole Scherer, and a third librarian from the Nassau County Library Association came in to talk about AI slop and what it means for the future. AI slop refers to poorly edited, weirdly formatted, strangely written books that find their way into ordinary collections. This happens w...