Skip to main content

Madeline Feehan Blog Post #2: Obnoxious Ads: Monetized Ads that Blend In




Blog Post #2- Obnoxious Ads

By Madeline Feehan

If you've used TikTok or even Pinterest lately, surely you've been tricked by an ad. Even the most savvy have fallen victim to this clever tactic. Both apps design their monetized posts to look like any other post, which tricks users into engaging with them. Whether it's a monetized Pin on Pinterest that blends in with the rest of your feed, or a TikTok ad that has a fake swipe that you automatically swipe, both will open a new tab and lead you somewhere else. Both will interrupt your experience, for better or worse. 

Having ads blend into plain sight is the tactic these sites use. They want to lull you into a false sense of security. They wait till you've been scrolling for a while, and swiping is muscle memory. These ads look convincing and like every other post, especially the TikTok In-Feed ads. All TikTok ads are required to have some kind of label indicating they're ads, such as small text that says "Sponsored" right under where the username would be or "#AD" in the caption. However, it can be very subtle, or can be incoporated into an influencer's video or some kind of brand partnership that makes it harder to determine whether it will take you to another site. The TikToks ads that blend in are referred to as "In-Feed Ads" designed to be embedded within the For You page and to look and have the same feel as other non-monetized posts. Usually, these ads are a picture or a short video that blends in. There are less strict rules for influencer or user content that has a similar function to an ad, so that's the type of content that can feel like a bit like a trap. 

Even if it's less outwardly obnoxious, Pinterest disguises its ads by making them look just like any other Pin. They seamlessly blend into your feed. However, unlike TikTok, the Pinterest ads usually have some small text that says "Sponsored" or some link symbol or arrow that suggests engaging will open a new tab or lead you to another site to learn more. Even if they are designed to fit in with the rest of your feed, they tend to be more clearly marked as leading you elsewhere.  Since these businesses partnering with Pinterest want to atract interested customers not accidental clickers, there's usually a "Shop Now" or "Buy Today" that makes the intentions clear. This way, the process is easy for those who want to visit the site or buy a product as soon as possible, and easier to avoid for those who simply want to scroll past. 

Since I've started this class and been paying more attention to social media than ever before, I've noticed this, and it makes me wonder why it's hard for social media companies to be more transparent. We all hate ads, but we would hate them less if they were obvious and clearly recognizable rather than feeling like they're going to trap us. 

Comments

  1. Hi Madeline, thanks for such a creative blog post! I think the general premise of ads and algorithm-oriented data collection and presentation that is hidden within applications like tiktok or pinterest is a very helpful discussion to have.To me, it has a similar feel of hidden ingredients within a snack or everyday food, or a corporate company lobbying for certain candidates on behalf of their promises of continue funding or not attacking the company for its "unsanctioned" behaviors. I think its so important to look at these "in-feed ads" that have so unquestionably taken over the use of more and more applications, and even finding a course or equally drafting and teaching a professional development min course on this topic is so important. Thanks for the share!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Madeline Feehan Blog Post #11: Killing Eve and "Bury your Gays" Backlash

Image source: The 'Killing Eve' Finale has Infuriated Queer Fans   Blog Post #11: Killing Eve and "Bury Your Gays" Backlash By Madeline Feehan Some of the fiercest allies and supporters of diversity, equity, and inclusion (and some of its greatest opponents) can be found in the unlikeliest of places: Tumblr, Twitter, and AO3. What do these people all have in common? They are heavily immersed in fandoms. Whether they're reblogging content or creating their own, whether they're starting Reddit threads, writing fanfiction, drawing fanart, posting to their stories, making video edits, or starting petitions, these fans all share a passion for fictional worlds. So what happens when a fandom all comes together and agrees on one thing? This is what happened with the Killing Eve fandom after the show's finale. Sometimes audiences are split between opinions. For example, when a beloved book gets turned into a movie, some will argue that the book's better or that...

Kristen Strmel Blog Post #11: #UnwhitewashTheBadBatch: How Social Media Holds Creators Accountable

Image source I want to say “It’s always a good day when I can talk about Star Wars,” but that’s not always true. Loving something means acknowledging its flaws, and it’s pretty safe to say that Star Wars as a franchise has a racism problem, from the lack of the BIPOC characters in its movies (and accession to stereotypes when they were depicted), to the racist harassment that that BIPOC actors in recent shows have faced from certain sections of the fandom. While the franchise has taken steps to address these issues in recent years, it’s still got work to do–and if it doesn’t, fans are more than willing to call it out. This exact thing happened in 2021, with the release of The Bad Batch. This show follows a group of clones (soldiers born and bred specifically to fight for the Galactic Republic, introduced in the Prequel Trilogy) known as “The Bad Batch” as they try to find their place in the galaxy during the Empire’s rise. Each member of the The Bad Batch had “desirable mutations” tha...

Madeline Feehan Blog Post #12: AI Books and Libraries

Image Source: Nana a Mischevious Monkey by Shum Zay on Amazon Blog Post #12: AI Books and Libraries By Madeline Feehan Is an AI author really an author? Are AI books valid, and should they be on library shelves, or should we steer clear of them? What about  AI- assisted   work? Is the best compromise adding some to our collection and clearly labeling them as AI, or is it best to not even indulge at all?  Do you find work that was written with the help of AI but was also written by a human less egregious than something entirely written by AI? Should those books still be labeled?  These are some of the many fascinating questions discussed by guest speakers who came to my library. Lisa Zuena, Nicole Scherer, and a third librarian from the Nassau County Library Association came in to talk about AI slop and what it means for the future. AI slop refers to poorly edited, weirdly formatted, strangely written books that find their way into ordinary collections. This happens w...